Skip to main content

Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large)

Fruits Per 100 g · Per 100g serving

Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large) is a fruit at 116 calories per 100g. It is an excellent source of Iron, providing 6.28 mg (78% of the Daily Value) per 100g serving. Fruits are naturally rich in vitamins, dietary fiber, and antioxidants. They are an important part of a balanced diet and contribute to daily micronutrient needs. Our database tracks 70 nutrients for this food, plus insulin index, polyphenol profile, environmental footprint data.

116
Calories
kcal
0.84
Protein
g
10.9
Fat
g
6.0
Carbs
g
1.6
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Iron
6.3 mg
78% DV
💎
Sodium
735 mg
49% DV
💎
Copper
0.25 mg
28% DV

Data for 70 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water SR80.0g
2%
Calories SR116kcal
Energy (kJ) SR485kj
Protein SR0.84g
2%
Total Fat SR10.9g
Carbohydrate SR6.0g
5%
Fiber SR1.6g
4%
Total Sugars SR0g
Ash SR2.2g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium SR88.0mg
9%
Iron SR6.3mg
78%
Magnesium SR4.0mg
1%
Phosphorus SR3.0mg
0%
Potassium SR8.0mg
0%
Sodium SR735mg
49%
Zinc SR0.22mg
2%
Copper SR0.25mg
28%
Manganese SR0.02mg
1%
Selenium SR0.90µg
2%
Vitamins 24
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) SR17.0µg
2%
Vitamin A (IU) SR330IU
Retinol SR0µg
Beta-Carotene SR198µg
Alpha-Carotene SR0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin SR0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR510µg
Vitamin C SR0.90mg
1%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) SR0IU
Vitamin E SR1.6mg
11%
Vitamin K1 SR1.4µg
1%
Thiamin (B1) SR0.003mg
0%
Riboflavin (B2) SR0mg
Niacin (B3) SR0.04mg
0%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.01mg
0%
Vitamin B6 SR0.009mg
1%
Folate SR0µg
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) SR0µg
Folate (DFE) SR0µg
Vitamin B12 SR0µg
Choline SR10.3mg
2%
Fatty Acids 8
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat SR2.3g
Monounsaturated Fat SR7.7g
Polyunsaturated Fat SR0.63g
Trans Fat SR0g
Cholesterol SR0mg
Omega-3 EPA SR0g
Omega-3 DPA SR0g
Omega-3 DHA SR0g
Amino Acids 16
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Threonine SR0.03g
Isoleucine SR0.03g
Leucine SR0.05g
Lysine SR0.03g
Methionine SR0.01g
Phenylalanine SR0.03g
Tyrosine SR0.02g
Valine SR0.04g
Arginine SR0.07g
Histidine SR0.02g
Alanine SR0.04g
Aspartic Acid SR0.09g
Glutamic Acid SR0.09g
Glycine SR0.05g
Proline SR0.04g
Serine SR0.03g
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine SR0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol SR0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

18
NRF9.3 Score
Moderate · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Dietary Fat + Vitamin E●●●

Vitamin E is fat-soluble and absorbed alongside dietary fats via micelle formation in the small intestine. Low-fat diets reduce vitamin E absorption.

Traber, Free Radic Biol Med, 2007

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Calcium vs Iron●●●

Calcium inhibits both heme and non-heme iron absorption when consumed in the same meal. The effect is dose-dependent, with significant inhibition at 300+ mg calcium.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

0
Amino Acid Score
Low
Tryptophan
Limiting Amino Acid
16
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Tryptophan. Pair with dairy, poultry, and eggs for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (16)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Threonine0.0331.0
Isoleucine0.0336.9
Leucine0.0559.5
Lysine0.0338.1
Methionine0.0114.3
Phenylalanine0.0334.5
Tyrosine0.0227.4
Valine0.0445.2
Arginine0.0779.8
Histidine0.0227.4
Alanine0.0451.2
Aspartic Acid0.09109.5
Glutamic Acid0.09110.7
Glycine0.0558.3
Proline0.0447.6
Serine0.0336.9

Fatty Acid Profile

Breakdown of fat types per 100g. A healthy fat profile favours unsaturated fats (mono + poly) and a balanced omega-3 to omega-6 ratio.

2.3g
Saturated
7.7g
Monounsaturated
0.63g
Polyunsaturated

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Fresh Fruits” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Vitamin C loses up to 30% when sautéed. Baked retains 80%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Insulin Response

The Insulin Index (II) measures the actual insulin response to food on a scale where white bread = 100. Unlike the Glycemic Index (which only measures blood sugar), the II captures the full hormonal response — including the effect of protein and fat on insulin secretion. This is why high-protein foods like meat and dairy can have significant insulin scores despite having low or zero GI values.

24
Insulin Index
Low Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 24
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
Macro Model ●● Estimated from macronutrient composition (R²=0.49)

Source: Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Polyphenols & Bioactive Compounds

Polyphenols are plant-derived compounds with antioxidant properties. Higher intake is associated with reduced cardiovascular risk and improved gut health.

569
Total Polyphenols
mg per 100g · Very_High
2
Polyphenol Classes
identified in this food
Flavonoids118 mg21%
Phenolic Acids451 mg79%

Processing Impact on Polyphenols

How common cooking methods affect polyphenol content in fruits. Retention % is relative to the raw/unprocessed food.

Best Method
Freezing
95% retained
Most Loss
Juicing
52% retained
🧊
Freezing95%
Excellent retention; flash-freezing preserves structure and polyp≈541 mg
☀️
Drying82%
Moderate heat degradation offset by concentration; sun-drying ret≈467 mg
🫕
Boiling68%
Significant leaching of water-soluble flavonoids into cooking wat≈387 mg
🔥
Baking/Roasting65%
Dry heat degrades anthocyanins more than other flavonoids≈370 mg
🥫
Canning55%
Prolonged thermal treatment and water contact cause significant l≈313 mg
🧃
Juicing52%
Fiber-bound polyphenols lost with pulp; clear juices lose more th≈296 mg

Health Associations

Research-backed associations for the polyphenol classes found in this food. Evidence strength rated from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

🔵
↑ Antioxidant capacityStrong
Phenolic Acids: Chlorogenic acid (coffee) and ferulic acid (grains) show consistent antioxidant
🔵
↑ Glucose metabolismModerate
Phenolic Acids: Chlorogenic acid may slow glucose absorption and improve insulin sensitivity
💜
↓ Cardiovascular disease riskModerate
Flavonoids: Meta-analyses of prospective cohorts show 10-20% lower CVD risk with higher flav
💜
↓ Blood pressureModerate
Flavonoids: RCTs show modest systolic BP reductions (2-5 mmHg) with flavanol-rich cocoa and
⚠ Most evidence is from observational studies and in vitro research. Randomized controlled trials are limited. Individual responses vary based on gut microbiome, genetics, and overall diet. Associations do not prove causation.

Polyphenol data matched from: “Olive, black” · ●●● high confidence

Source: Phenol-Explorer 3.6 (INRA, 2023) · Retention: Rothwell 2013, Palermo 2014 · Health: Del Bo' 2019, Grosso 2017

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Other Fruit” category.

1.1
kg CO₂e / kg
Low Impact
1.4
m² land / kg
Land Use
153
L water / kg
Water Use
4.8
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions1.1 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use1.4 m² / kg
Water Use153 L / kg
Eutrophication3.6 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification4.8 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Fruits

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Fruits” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
618
2.
424
3.
422
4.
416
5.
366
6.
352
7.
317
8.
308
9.
293
10.
286

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+38%
1961: 93 kcal2023: 128 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large)?

Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large) contains 116 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 0.84g of protein (3% of calories), 10.9g of fat (85%), and 6.0g of carbohydrates (21%). Fat is the primary energy source.

What is Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large) most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large) is Iron, providing 6.3 mg per 100g (78% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Sodium (49% DV). Our database tracks 70 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large) high in protein?

At 0.84g per 100 grams, Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large) is not a significant source of protein. Pair with protein-rich foods like legumes, meat, fish, or dairy to meet daily protein needs.

How much fiber is in Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large)?

Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large) contains 1.6g of fiber per 100 grams, which is a small amount. To increase fiber intake, consider pairing with high-fiber foods such as legumes, whole grains, or vegetables.

Does Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large) contain polyphenols?

Yes, Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large) contains approximately 569 mg of polyphenols per 100g, primarily from the very high class. Polyphenols are bioactive plant compounds associated with antioxidant properties. Their retention can vary with cooking and processing methods — see the processing impact section above for details.

What is the insulin index of Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large)?

Olives, ripe, canned (small-extra large) has a low insulin response (II: 24) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This means it triggers relatively little insulin secretion, which may be relevant for those managing insulin sensitivity or following low-insulin dietary strategies. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.