Skip to main content

Taro, raw

Vegetables Per 100 g · Per 100g serving
Data sources: 65 AFCD 14 SR Legacy

Taro, raw is a vegetable at 112 calories per 100g. This vegetable is a useful source of fiber, virtually fat-free. Vegetables provide essential vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber with relatively few calories. They are a cornerstone of virtually every dietary guideline worldwide. Our database tracks 79 nutrients for this food, plus glycemic index, insulin index, environmental footprint data.

112
Calories
kcal
1.5
Protein
g
0.20
Fat
g
23.4
Carbs
g
3.5
Fiber
g

Top Nutrients

💎
Copper
0.17 mg
19% DV
💪
Carbohydrate
23.4 g
18% DV
☀️
Vitamin C
16.0 mg
18% DV

Data for 79 of 150 tracked nutrients

Nutrient Fingerprint

How this food scores across key nutrient categories, as a percentage of the daily recommended value per 100 g. Based on USDA DRIs for adults.

Complete Nutrient Profile

Macronutrients 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Water AFCD68.9g
2%
Calories AFCD112kcal
Energy (kJ) SR469kj
Protein SR1.5g
3%
Total Fat AFCD0.20g
Carbohydrate AFCD23.4g
18%
Fiber AFCD3.5g
9%
Total Sugars SR0.40g
Starch AFCD22.3g
Ash AFCD1.0g
Minerals 10
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Calcium AFCD12.0mg
1%
Iron AFCD0.70mg
9%
Magnesium AFCD20.0mg
5%
Phosphorus AFCD84.0mg
12%
Potassium AFCD300mg
9%
Sodium AFCD6.0mg
0%
Zinc AFCD0.60mg
6%
Copper SR0.17mg
19%
Manganese SR0.38mg
17%
Selenium AFCD0µg
Vitamins 26
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Vitamin A (RAE) AFCD5.0µg
1%
Vitamin A (IU) SR76.0IU
Retinol AFCD0µg
Beta-Carotene AFCD20.0µg
Alpha-Carotene AFCD0µg
Beta-Cryptoxanthin AFCD20.0µg
Lycopene SR0µg
Lutein + Zeaxanthin SR0µg
Vitamin C AFCD16.0mg
18%
Vitamin D SR0µg
Vitamin D (IU) AFCD0IU
Vitamin D2 AFCD0µg
Vitamin D3 AFCD0µg
Vitamin E AFCD2.4mg
16%
Vitamin K1 SR1.0µg
1%
Thiamin (B1) AFCD0.06mg
5%
Riboflavin (B2) AFCD0.02mg
2%
Niacin (B3) AFCD0.70mg
4%
Pantothenic Acid (B5) SR0.30mg
6%
Vitamin B6 AFCD0.22mg
17%
Folate AFCD62.0µg
16%
Folic Acid SR0µg
Folate (food) AFCD62.0µg
Folate (DFE) AFCD62.0µg
Vitamin B12 AFCD0µg
Choline SR17.3mg
3%
Fatty Acids 9
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Saturated Fat AFCD0g
Monounsaturated Fat AFCD0g
Polyunsaturated Fat AFCD0g
Trans Fat AFCD0g
Cholesterol AFCD0mg
Omega-3 ALA AFCD0g
Omega-3 EPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DPA AFCD0g
Omega-3 DHA AFCD0g
Individual Fatty Acids 2
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Capric Acid (10:0) AFCD0g
Linoleic Acid (18:2) AFCD0g
Amino Acids 18
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Tryptophan AFCD0.03g
Threonine AFCD0.05g
Isoleucine AFCD0.04g
Leucine AFCD0.09g
Lysine AFCD0.06g
Methionine AFCD0.02g
Cystine AFCD0.04g
Phenylalanine AFCD0.07g
Tyrosine AFCD0.05g
Valine AFCD0.06g
Arginine AFCD0.24g
Histidine AFCD0.03g
Alanine AFCD0.07g
Aspartic Acid AFCD0.22g
Glutamic Acid AFCD0.14g
Glycine AFCD0.06g
Proline AFCD0.05g
Serine AFCD0.09g
Phytochemicals 1
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Oxalic Acid AFCD0mg
Other 3
NutrientPer 100gUnitPer Serving% DV
Caffeine AFCD0mg
Theobromine SR0mg
Alcohol AFCD0g

Nutrient Density Score

The NRF9.3 score measures overall nutritional quality per 100 kcal. It rewards 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, E, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium) and penalizes 3 to limit (saturated fat, added sugars, sodium). Higher is better; negative scores indicate the food is high in limit nutrients relative to its beneficial content.

58
NRF9.3 Score
Good · per 100 kcal
Poor (<0) Moderate Good Excellent (100+)

NRF9.3 index: Fulgoni et al. (2009), J Nutr 139(8). DVs based on FDA 2020 reference values.

Nutrient Interactions in This Food

Nutrients in this food that enhance or compete with each other during absorption.

✔ Synergies — nutrients that help each other

Vitamin C + Iron●●●

Vitamin C dramatically enhances non-heme iron absorption by reducing Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ in the gut. Adding 75 mg vitamin C to a meal can increase iron absorption 3–4 fold.

Hallberg et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1989

Dietary Fat + Vitamin E●●●

Vitamin E is fat-soluble and absorbed alongside dietary fats via micelle formation in the small intestine. Low-fat diets reduce vitamin E absorption.

Traber, Free Radic Biol Med, 2007

Vitamin C + Vitamin E●●

Vitamin C regenerates oxidised vitamin E (tocopheroxyl radical) back to its active form, extending its antioxidant function in cell membranes.

Niki, Free Radic Biol Med, 2014

Vitamin B6 + Magnesium●●

Vitamin B6 may enhance intracellular magnesium accumulation. Combined supplementation has shown greater benefits for stress and anxiety than magnesium alone.

Pouteau et al., PLoS One, 2018

Vitamin B6 + Folate●●

Vitamin B6 is a cofactor in folate-dependent one-carbon metabolism. Together with B12, these three nutrients regulate homocysteine levels.

Selhub, J Nutr Health Aging, 2002

⚠ Antagonisms — nutrients that compete

Zinc vs Copper●●●

High zinc intake induces metallothionein in enterocytes, which traps copper and blocks its absorption. Prolonged high-dose zinc can cause copper deficiency.

Prasad et al., JAMA, 1978; Fosmire, Am J Clin Nutr, 1990

Zinc vs Iron●●

Zinc and non-heme iron compete for the same intestinal transporter (DMT1). High doses of one can reduce absorption of the other when taken simultaneously.

Rossander-Hulten et al., Am J Clin Nutr, 1991

Fiber vs Iron●●

Phytates in high-fibre foods (whole grains, legumes) bind non-heme iron and reduce its bioavailability. Soaking, sprouting, and fermentation reduce phytate content.

Hurrell & Egli, Int J Vitam Nutr Res, 2010

Fiber vs Zinc●●

Phytates in fibre-rich foods chelate zinc, reducing its bioavailability by up to 50% in high-phytate diets. This is a major concern in plant-based diets.

Sandstrom, Food Nutr Res, 1997

Manganese vs Iron●●

Manganese and iron share the DMT1 transporter and compete for absorption. High iron status reduces manganese absorption and vice versa.

Erikson et al., Pharmacol Ther, 2007

Amino Acid Profile

Essential amino acid composition compared to the WHO/FAO adult reference pattern. The Amino Acid Score indicates protein quality — 100 means all essential amino acid requirements are met.

89
Amino Acid Score
Good
Lysine
Limiting Amino Acid
18
Amino Acids Tracked

Tip: The limiting amino acid is Lysine. Pair with legumes, dairy, and soy for a complete amino acid profile.

All Amino Acids (18)
Amino Acidg / 100gmg / g protein
Tryptophan0.0320.7
Threonine0.0533.3
Isoleucine0.0429.3
Leucine0.0960.7
Lysine0.0640.0
Methionine0.0210.7
Cystine0.0424.0
Phenylalanine0.0745.3
Tyrosine0.0533.3
Valine0.0640.0
Arginine0.24160.0
Histidine0.0320.7
Alanine0.0743.3
Aspartic Acid0.22149.3
Glutamic Acid0.1494.0
Glycine0.0638.0
Proline0.0534.7
Serine0.0958.7

How Cooking Changes Nutrients

Estimated percentage of each nutrient retained after cooking, based on USDA retention factors for the “Other Vegetables” food category. Values of 100% mean no loss; lower values indicate nutrients lost to heat, water, or oxidation.

Key insights
Folate loses up to 31% when boiled (drained). Boiled (water used) retains 85%.
Choline loses up to 10% when fried. Boiled (drained) retains 100%.

Source: USDA Table of Nutrient Retention Factors, Release 6 (2007). Retention values are category-level averages — actual retention depends on cooking time, temperature, and water volume.

USDA Retention Factors

Glycemic & Insulin Response

The Glycemic Index (GI) measures how quickly a food raises blood sugar on a 0–100 scale. The Insulin Index (II) measures the insulin response directly, which can differ from GI — notably, dairy and high-protein foods often trigger a higher insulin response than their GI suggests. White bread = 100 for both scales.

53
Glycemic Index
Low GI
4
Glycemic Load
Low GL (per 150g)
GI Scale 53
0 Low <55 Med High ≥70 100

GI data matched from: “Taro, boiled” · ●●● high confidence

46
Insulin Index
Moderate Insulin Response
Insulin Index Scale 46
0 Low ≤30 Mod ≤60 High ≤100 120
GI Model ●● Estimated via GI-based regression (R²=0.78)

Source: International Tables of Glycemic Index (Sydney University, 2021) · Holt et al. 1997; Bao et al. 2016; Bell 2014

Environmental Impact

Environmental footprint per kilogram of food produced. Data represents the global average for the “Cassava” category.

1.3
kg CO₂e / kg
Low Impact
1.8
m² land / kg
Land Use
0
L water / kg
Water Use
1.5
g SO₂e / kg
Acidification
How this compares (GHG emissions)
Potatoes (0.5)Chicken (9.9)Beef (99.5)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions1.3 kg CO₂e / kg
Land Use1.8 m² / kg
Eutrophication4.7 g PO₄e / kg
Acidification1.5 g SO₂e / kg
⚠️ Important context about this data
  • Global averages: These figures are production-weighted averages from a meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms across 119 countries (Poore & Nemecek, 2018). Actual impact varies enormously by farming method, geography, and supply chain.
  • System boundary: Cradle-to-retail only — does not include consumer transport, home cooking energy, or food waste.
  • Soil carbon not included: This data does not account for soil carbon sequestration. Some argue that well-managed regenerative grazing partially offsets ruminant emissions; however, full lifecycle accounting — including methane, land-use change, and the opportunity cost of using land for grazing vs. reforestation — typically makes the net footprint of ruminant meat higher, not lower. This is especially relevant in temperate grassland regions like Ireland.
  • Not gospel: This data is informational and illustrative. It is useful for understanding relative magnitudes, but should not be treated as precise measurements for any individual product or farm.

Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science 360(6392). Meta-analysis of ~38,700 farms, 119 countries, 46 product categories.

Global Supply: Vegetables

Top 10 countries by per capita supply of the “Vegetables” food group (kcal/capita/day, 2023). This is food group–level data from FAO Food Balance Sheets, not specific to this individual food.

1.
310
2.
306
3.
258
4.
221
5.
209
6.
204
7.
192
8.
190
9.
186
10.
183

Global Supply Trend (1961–2023)

+76%
1961: 38 kcal2023: 67 kcal

Source: FAO Food Balance Sheets (2023). Supply = production + imports − exports − waste, converted to kcal/capita/day.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many calories are in Taro, raw?

Taro, raw contains 112 kcal per 100 grams, making it a moderate-calorie food. The energy comes from 1.5g of protein (5% of calories), 0.20g of fat (2%), and 23.4g of carbohydrates (84%). Carbohydrates are the primary energy source.

What is Taro, raw most nutritious for?

The standout nutrient in Taro, raw is Copper, providing 0.17 mg per 100g (19% of the Daily Value). It is also a notable source of Carbohydrate (18% DV). Our database tracks 79 individual nutrients for this food, allowing detailed comparison across vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids.

Is Taro, raw high in protein?

At 1.5g per 100 grams, Taro, raw is not a significant source of protein. Pair with protein-rich foods like legumes, meat, fish, or dairy to meet daily protein needs.

How much fiber is in Taro, raw?

Taro, raw contains 3.5g of fiber per 100 grams — a moderate amount. This contributes to the recommended daily intake of 25-38g. Pairing with other fiber-rich foods like vegetables, legumes, or whole grains can help meet daily targets.

What is the glycemic index of Taro, raw?

Taro, raw has a glycemic index of 53, which is classified as low (≤55). Low-GI foods cause a slower, more gradual rise in blood sugar levels, which may be beneficial for blood sugar management. The glycemic load, which accounts for typical serving size, provides additional context for real-world blood sugar impact.

What is the insulin index of Taro, raw?

Taro, raw has a moderate insulin response (II: 46) (estimated from macronutrient composition) on the insulin index scale (white bread = 100). This is a typical insulin response for most mixed foods. Note that the insulin index can differ substantially from the glycemic index — dairy products and high-protein foods often have higher insulin responses than their GI would suggest.